A systematic or scoping review needs a focused question, reproducible searching, explicit criteria and a traceable synthesis. Support focuses on method, evidence organisation and transparent reporting.
Define the question and review type
Clarify whether the project answers a focused question, maps a broad field, identifies gaps or compares methods. This determines databases, criteria and synthesis.
Reproducible search strategy
Concepts, synonyms, operators and justified limits are documented so the process can be explained and repeated.
Evidence matrix and synthesis
A structured matrix separates study characteristics, methods, findings, limitations and relevance. Synthesis may be narrative, thematic or quantitative when data allow.
Traceability and limitations
The review should show what was searched, what was excluded and why, and avoid conclusions stronger than the available evidence.
Possible deliverables
How the work is organised
The objective, available documents and data are reviewed first; scope, deliverables, missing information and review points are then defined. Support may cover one phase or connect with methodology, laboratory work, analysis and reporting.
Frequently asked questions
Are systematic and scoping reviews the same?
No. Scoping reviews often map broader fields while systematic reviews commonly answer more focused questions.
Can the literature search be supported?
Yes. Support may cover the question, search terms, criteria, evidence matrix and synthesis structure.
Is publication guaranteed?
No. Acceptance depends on quality, authorship, journal requirements and editorial review.